Earlier today, I made the mistake of praising the UN indirectly because its new chief appears to be a far more reasonable man than Kofi Annan. However, Secretary General Ban MUST speak out against the blatant anti-Semitism of the official Arab world:
Saudi Arabia has barred entry to a Washington-based Israeli journalist traveling with Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on his current Middle East tour, the United Nations said today.
Mr. Ban is going to Riyadh on Tuesday for two days of the summit meeting of the League of Arab States.
Orly Azoulay, the Washington bureau chief of Yediot Aharonot, was unable to obtain a visa to Saudi Arabia despite assurances the Saudi mission in New York gave the United Nations last week, said Michéle Montas, Mr. Ban’s spokeswoman.
Ms. Montas said that both Lebanon and Saudi Arabia initially refused to grant Ms. Azoulay a visa, but that Lebanon had dropped its objections last week and given her the needed stamp.
Ms. Azoulay, 53, an Israeli-born dual citizen of France and Israel, sought the visa on her French passport. She said she had traveled during the past two years to Afghanistan, Iran, Lebanon, Iraq and Pakistan and had gone to Saudi Arabia in 2000 with correspondents covering then-Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright.
When the Saudi consulate in New York returned the passports of the 11 news reporters and broadcasters to United Nations headquarters on Friday afternoon, only Ms. Azoulay’s bore no Saudi visa. Ms. Montas said this occurred despite repeated appeals to the Saudis during the week from Vijay Nambiar, Mr. Ban’s chief of staff.
Mr. Azoulay joined the trip in London on Thursday, and Ms. Montas said that the United Nations had been told that the visa might come through while the United Nations group proceeded to Cairo and Jordan.
In recent days, though, she said, the Saudi mission did not return calls from United Nations officials, and they have now concluded that Ms. Azoulay will be not be allowed to accompany the United Nations group to Riyadh.
“The Saudis have a lot of countries coming which have no relations to Israel, and it appears they had more concern about that than they did about the United Nations,” said an organization official who asked not to be identified so as to speak frankly.
Mr. Ban will be in Israel on Sunday and then go to Riyadh with only a six-hour stopover in Jordan for a working lunch with King Abdullah II.
Israel granted visas to all 11 news people, including at least 3 who are Arab- or Iranian-born and traveling on European passports.
“When the secretary general decides that he will take under his auspices a group of journalists, then there is some kind of responsibility that he takes upon himself and we respect this and this is the reason Israel granted the visas without hesitation,” said Daniel Carmon, Israel’s deputy United Nations ambassador.
Asked the United Nations’ reaction, Ms. Montas said, “What she was trying to do was to report objectively, which would improve the political climate in the region and would have been an asset to the secretary general’s mission.”
I quote in full because the story is very important. We see the discrimination in such stark terms here that the implications are unavoidable.
It’s true that the Secretary General cannot, by himself, end anti-Semitism…but he can send a powerful message by cancelling his trip to Riyadh. Unfortunately, he will do no such thing…and his inaction will give implicit endorsement to the anti-Semitic actions of the Arab League.
This story will get no play, either - and that’s a bigger shame, because it shows that there truly is a resurgence of anti-Semitism in much of the world. Kudos to the New York Times, an organization I’m often deeply critical of, for at least reporting this…
March 25th, 2007 at 9:44 pm
I don’t say it to mean smug, but does this apply across the board to people who have too-close relations with Saudi Arabia?
March 25th, 2007 at 10:04 pm
Absolutely…in general, the Bush Administration, like all of its predecessors, gives Saudi Arabia too much leeway over issues like this.
But this issue is quite specific and quite blatant…
March 26th, 2007 at 7:12 am
I think that there needs to be a combination of rebuke and engagement, really. Messages need to be sent that the civilized world doesn’t tolerate crap like that, but it’s also important to not cut things off to the point of deepening and exacerbating tensions, you know what I mean?
March 26th, 2007 at 10:18 am
Exactly. Go ahead with the meeting and add the refusal to issue this journalist a visa to the agenda - top of the list would be a good place.