The Devil Is In The Details
Is there a ceasefire in sight? At first glance, maybe:
President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair announced agreement today to seek a United Nations resolution next week that would send a multinational force to southern Lebanon and end hostilities between Israel and the Lebanese Hezbollah militia.
Speaking to reporters after a meeting with Blair at the White House, Bush said he is sending Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice back to the Middle East from a conference in Malaysia to try to obtain agreement from the governments of Lebanon and Israel on the U.S.-British plan.
Sounds pretty promising, eh? But here’s the rub:
Bush and Blair said their plan, which calls for the disarming of Hezbollah in accordance with a 2004 U.N. Security Council resolution, will ensure a durable peace, rather than a temporary cease-fire.
…Bush…would not say whether Hezbollah’s agreement to accept the force should be a “precondition” for deploying it. But he noted that “Hezbollah is not a state,” and he said the key is to get the governments of Lebanon and Israel to agree to the force, which he said would “serve as a complement” to the Lebanese army and would “help the Lebanese army succeed.”
Since disarming Hezbollah is the entire point of Israel’s war, I’m not sure that this is really a step forward. I need more of those devilish details to form an opinion…

Isreal does’nt pay the UN or NATO. Isreal won’t allow peacekeepers in Isreal. Isreal does’nt want a cease fire. Isreal won’t pay war reparations. Disarming Hezbollah won’t stop Isreal from invading again.