Krauthammer Pops The Question
Never again? The question inevitably arises in discussions of anti-Semitism. It’s a shorthand for a cultural determination on the part of most Jews to prevent the conditions that led to their near-extermination from arising again. Those who recoil against an over-sensitivity on the part of Israel’s leaders and defenders to the recent Iranian provocations would do well to remember this context.
Charles Krauthammer certainly does, and his column today comes highly recommended. I am quoting the conclusion in its entirety:
The establishment of Israel was a Jewish declaration to a world that had allowed the Holocaust to happen — after Hitler had made his intentions perfectly clear — that the Jews would henceforth resort to self-protection and self-reliance. And so they have, building a Jewish army, the first in 2,000 years, that prevailed in three great wars of survival (1948-49, 1967 and 1973).
But in a cruel historical irony, doing so required concentration — putting all the eggs back in one basket, a tiny territory hard by the Mediterranean, eight miles wide at its waist. A tempting target for those who would finish Hitler’s work.
His successors now reside in Tehran. The world has paid ample attention to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s declaration that Israel must be destroyed. Less attention has been paid to Iranian leaders’ pronouncements on exactly how Israel would be “eliminated by one storm,” as Ahmadinejad has promised.
Former president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the presumed moderate of this gang, has explained that “the use of a nuclear bomb in Israel will leave nothing on the ground, whereas it will only damage the world of Islam.” The logic is impeccable, the intention clear: A nuclear attack would effectively destroy tiny Israel, while any retaliation launched by a dying Israel would have no major effect on an Islamic civilization of a billion people stretching from Mauritania to Indonesia.
As it races to acquire nuclear weapons, Iran makes clear that if there is any trouble, the Jews will be the first to suffer. “We have announced that wherever [in Iran] America does make any mischief, the first place we target will be Israel,” said Gen. Mohammad Ebrahim Dehghani, a top Revolutionary Guards commander. Hitler was only slightly more direct when he announced seven months before invading Poland that, if there was another war, “the result will be . . . the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.”
Last week Bernard Lewis, America’s dean of Islamic studies, who just turned 90 and remembers the 20th century well, confessed that for the first time he feels it is 1938 again. He did not need to add that in 1938, in the face of the gathering storm — a fanatical, aggressive, openly declared enemy of the West, and most determinedly of the Jews — the world did nothing.
When Iran’s mullahs acquire their coveted nukes in the next few years, the number of Jews in Israel will just be reaching 6 million. Never again?
There are some who will say of Krauthammer, “There he goes again…” – but Bernard Lewis? Those are troubling sentiments that we would do well to heed…

So all Jews live in Israel, who knew?
So as long as we have a few spare Jews here and there, we don’t have to worry about the fate of Israel, dswarts?
Krauthammer may not come out and say it here, but in an article At Last Zion he expresses his view that the destruction of Israel would result in the end of the Jewish people.
Check out a reply letter to Iranian Presiden by an Israeli student:
http://tlv.newsvine.com/_news/2006/05/11/193709-letter-to-iranian-president-from-an-israeli-where-is-home
[...] Only in Chomsky’s world can the Iranian president, a notorious anti-Semite and Holocaust denier, threaten to remove Israel from the map with the strong hint that he would gladly nuke them, and Israel then be accused of provocation. The second step refers to the abdication of U.S. sovereignty to the UN, which would give up its nuclear fuel processing and place it under international control. The third step would be unilateral American disarming of its nuclear stockpile, as we can be sure that our enemies will not submit to UN verification. Just look at Iran, something Chomsky seems loath to do. [...]