…for supporters of a conservative judiciary, and you can feel the celebration in the air. It’s also a great day for those of us who were out front on the Gang of 14 deal, and while it be may be a bit unseemly to toot our own horns, we’re doing a little tootin’ all the same. Adam C. joins in at RedState:
Whatever your original opinion on “The Deal,” one should acknowledge that Justices Roberts and Alito are a result of the agreement. Today 42 obstructionist Senators voted against a “well-qualified” nominee because they disagree with his judicial philosohphy [sic] of allegiance to the original intent of the Constitution. Technically, they could have filibustered Justice Alito. However, due to “The Deal” such an effort was impossible. All 7 of the Democratic members of the “gang of 14″ voted against cloture thus dooming the effort. Since the cloture vote was not going to pass, a slew of other responsible Democrats bolted from the unprecendented partisan filibuster of a majority-supported nominee. But those Democrats might have been convinced to vote against cloture if it wasn’t for the efforts of the “gang.”
Well said, well said…
February 1st, 2006 at 12:35 am
Well, I still think the “Gang of 14″ deal sucked (it allowed the Dems to continue to fillibuster some Bush nominees). But I will admit it did have one advantage:
It meant the Dems got to have their fillibuster debacle.